Hochul Tort Reform Tightens NY Injury Threshold
New York's $268B budget eliminates the 90/180 'serious injury' rule and bars recovery for plaintiffs more than 50% at fault.

Hochul Tort Reform Tightens NY Injury Threshold

Shere Saidon
Shere Saidon

CEO & Founder at LlamaLab

Published May 18, 2026
7 min read
Legal Updates

Hochul Tort Reform Tightens NY Injury Threshold

New York's auto injury litigation framework faces structural changes after Governor Kathy Hochul announced a $268 billion state budget agreement on May 7, 2026 that includes targeted tort reforms for motor vehicle claims. The agreement eliminates the 90/180 "serious injury" category under New York's no-fault law, narrows the definition of serious injury to require objective medical verification, and shifts the state from pure comparative fault to a modified rule that bars non-economic damages for plaintiffs found more than 50% at fault.

The package reflects a long-running dispute between the governor's office, the insurance industry, and the New York State Trial Lawyers Association, which argued the statutory changes shift economic burdens onto injured drivers without guaranteeing lower premiums. Final budget language was scheduled for legislative action the week of May 11, 2026, following discussions between the executive chamber and legislative leaders.

$268B

Size of NY 2026-27 budget agreement containing tort provisions (Insurance Journal)

51%

At-fault threshold above which plaintiffs cannot recover non-economic damages

$1,935

Average NY household auto insurance premium in 2024 (Triple I)

Key Statutory Revisions

According to Insurance Journal's review of the agreement, the budget incorporates core elements of the administration's auto tort proposals while modifying several provisions during legislative negotiations:

Provisions in the Final Deal

  • Elimination of the 90/180 serious injury category under Insurance Law §5102(d)
  • Refined serious-injury definitions requiring objective clinical and diagnostic proof
  • Modified comparative fault: plaintiffs more than 50% at fault recover nothing on non-economic damages (CPLR §1411)
  • Jury sequencing rule requiring fault allocation prior to threshold determinations
  • Enhanced fraud penalties for staged accidents and extended claims investigation windows
  • Mandatory telematics rate discounts and prior approval for insurer rate adjustments

Dropped or Modified

  • Repeal of CPLR §1602(6): joint and several liability protection for motor vehicle claims was preserved
  • Selected executive fraud enforcement provisions adjusted by lawmakers
  • Underwriting restrictions: ZIP codes, education, and occupation are excluded as rating criteria
  • Five-percent flex rating system removed; rate adjustments require Department of Financial Services approval

The elimination of the 90/180 category carries direct implications for personal injury caseloads. Under Insurance Law §5102(d), this category permitted accident victims to pursue non-economic damages if an injury prevented them from performing substantially all daily activities for at least 90 of the 180 days following a collision. Without this pathway, claims must satisfy stricter statutory thresholds: permanent loss of a body organ or member, permanent consequential limitation, significant limitation of use, fracture, dismemberment, or death.

Jury Sequencing Rules

An amendment to Insurance Law §5104(a) establishes a mandatory order of determination for juries at trial. Juries must resolve liability allocation before reaching the threshold inquiry, and resolve the threshold before evaluating non-economic damages:

Threshold check

Step 1: Allocate Fault

The jury determines each party's percentage of fault. If the plaintiff is allocated 51% or greater responsibility, the inquiry ends and non-economic damages are barred.

Threshold check

Step 2: Evaluate Serious Injury

If the plaintiff clears the fault threshold, the jury determines whether the medical evidence satisfies surviving §5102(d) categories. Subjective activity logs alone are no longer sufficient.

Outcome

Step 3: Determine Damages

Non-economic damages are calculated only after liability and threshold criteria are established.

Legislative Context and Premium Data

The administration framed the reforms around statewide auto coverage costs. New York households paid an average of $1,935 for personal auto insurance in 2024, up from $1,753 in 2023, according to the Insurance Information Institute (Triple I). This represented 2.23% of median household income, compared to the 1.59% national average, ranking New York behind Louisiana, Florida, and Mississippi.

Executive branch officials pointed to litigation volume and staged accident fraud as cost drivers. Support came from commercial carriers, rideshare operators, municipal leaders, and industry coalitions.

The plaintiff bar contested the premise, arguing that statutory restrictions on recovery limit injured parties' rights without guaranteeing corresponding premium reductions:

Insurance profits must not come at the expense of justice, accountability, or the rights of injured New Yorkers.

Andrew Finkelstein
President, New York State Trial Lawyers Association

Operational Adjustments for Litigation Practices

For New York personal injury firms, the elimination of the 90/180 category and the adoption of modified comparative fault require adjustments across intake, discovery, and file management:

New York No-Fault and Tort Framework Comparison

IssuePrior Regime (Pre-2026)
Updated Budget Framework
Pain & Suffering Threshold90/180 activity-based standard available for non-permanent injuries
90/180 removed; objective clinical proof required under remaining §5102(d) categories
Comparative Fault StandardPure comparative fault: recovery permitted above 50% plaintiff fault
Modified comparative fault: recovery barred for non-economic damages at 51%+ fault
Jury Deliberation OrderThreshold and damages could be evaluated in varying sequence
Fault determined first; threshold and damages reached only if fault is 50% or less
Joint & Several LiabilityMotor vehicle exception under CPLR §1602(6) preserved joint liability
Unchanged: proposed repeal was excluded from the final agreement
Insurance Rate Regulation5% flex-rating allowed; ZIP, education, and occupation usable as criteria
DFS prior approval required; geographic and demographic rating factors restricted

Early Diagnostic and Clinical Verification

Because surviving serious injury categories turn on objective medical verification, counsel must establish clinical findings early in the litigation lifecycle. As noted in litigation analyses by defense practitioners, early medical evaluation will be essential under the revised standard.

Intake and discovery workflows must verify pre-existing records, MRI/CT imaging, orthopedic consultations, and objective range-of-motion measurements before filing notes of issue.

Intake Risk Assessment

Modified comparative fault increases intake scrutiny on split-liability matters. Intersection collisions, lane-change claims, and comparative negligence scenarios require thorough early investigations, including scene imagery, witness statements, dashcam data, and emergency department records, to establish liability allocation from the outset.

Managing Threshold Motions

Summary judgment practice under Insurance Law §5102(d) will focus heavily on objective medical documentation. Unretrieved specialist records, missing diagnostic studies, or unaddressed pre-existing conditions create exposure on threshold motions.

Reverse search uses insurance data to fill in treatment gaps clients don't always remember, surfacing facilities, dates, and clinicians as needed.

Key Implementation Questions

Enabling legislation will clarify several operational aspects of the budget agreement:

Effective Date Scope

Statutory language will determine whether revisions apply to pending actions, new filings, or only accidents occurring after enactment.

  • Retroactive application would prompt immediate portfolio audits
  • Prospective application allows managed workflow transitions
  • Statutory effective dates govern case management

Multi-Party Liability Allocation

Courts will apply modified comparative fault standards across multi-vehicle collisions and commercial coverage disputes.

  • Joint and several liability remains intact for motor vehicle claims
  • Apportionment among co-defendants requires detailed discovery
  • Appellate decisions will define boundary interpretations

Rate Review and Consumer Premiums

Department of Financial Services oversight will evaluate whether statutory changes affect consumer premium filings.

  • Rate revisions require prior administrative approval
  • Excess profit rules monitor carrier underwriting margins
  • Upcoming rate cycles provide empirical data

Consumer Regulatory Provisions

Alongside tort modifications, the budget enacted new consumer insurance regulations. All carrier rate increases now require Department of Financial Services prior approval, while underwriting factors based on ZIP codes, education, and occupation are prohibited. The agreement also provides mandatory discounts for policyholders utilizing telematics technology.

Practical Impact on New York Personal Injury Practice

The 2026 New York budget updates statutory standards that have guided motor vehicle litigation for decades. The removal of the 90/180 category and the adoption of modified comparative fault require early, objective clinical documentation on every active file.

Firms managing personal injury portfolios must assemble comprehensive medical records early in the case lifecycle: identifying treating facilities, securing complete imaging and specialist reports, and substantiating serious injury thresholds before motion practice begins.

Medical record retrieval functions as a direct case disbursement, with itemized per-case invoices flowing through to settlement statements.

Build Objective Medical Proof for NY Cases

LlamaLab retrieves complete medical records in 4 days on average, with roughly 30-40% returned same-day on electronic requests. Identify missing treating providers and verify threshold injuries early.


Sources: Insurance Journal: Budget Deal Announcement (May 7, 2026), Landman Corsi Ballaine & Ford: Litigation Impact Analysis, Insurance Journal: NY Premium Data via Triple I, Mondaq: NY Governor's Motor Vehicle Tort Reform Proposal, Bloomberg Law: Trial Lawyers Oppose Plan.

This article provides general information about New York tort reform developments and should not be construed as legal advice. Consult qualified counsel for advice specific to your matter.

Stay Updated with Latest Insights

Get the latest articles about medical record retrieval and legal tech delivered to your inbox.