LlamaLab vs ChartSquad
ChartSquad is the superior choice for firms that want patient-directed right-of-access retrieval at the lowest cost permitted by law, with records landing in a shareable Personal Health Record. LlamaLab excels as a plaintiff-side medical evidence platform best suited for firms that need records in days and a clinical decision, particularly records back in 4 days on average versus their published 15-day average, reverse provider discovery that finds treatment clients never listed and a licensed clinical team that qualifies proof of injury.
Speed and discovery, not just the lowest legal fee
ChartSquad is a Personal Health Record that retrieves records under the patient's federal right of access, at the lowest cost permitted by law, with a 15-day nationwide average.
| Capability | LlamaLab | ChartSquad |
|---|---|---|
| Category focus | AI-native medical evidence for plaintiff firms | Patient-access PHR retrieval for patients and their representatives |
| Track record | Trusted by 250+ law firms; AI-native since 2024 | Founded 2012 |
| Retrieval turnaround | 4 days on average; 30 to 40% of records back same day | 15-day nationwide average (per ChartSquad) |
| Facility relationships | Healthcare-to-healthcare entity; direct facility partnerships move requests past standard vendor queues | Does not publicly document healthcare-entity status or direct facility partnerships |
| Provider discovery | Reverse search runs insurance claims data to find providers clients never listed; 4M+ facility network | Retrieves from any U.S. provider the patient or firm requests |
| Case qualification | Licensed clinical team qualifies proof of injury in under 7 days | Not offered; delivers records into a PHR |
| Portfolio / AI queries | Plain-English queries for complex medical records across the entire portfolio | Patient PHR with share controls; professional portal for firms |
| Pricing & recoverability | Public pricing: $50 per facility request, retrieval-only billing, fully recoverable, optional pay-only-for-qualified-cases model | Request is free; provider fees passed through at the lowest legally permitted cost (per ChartSquad) |
| Primary audience | Personal injury & mass tort plaintiff firms wanting speed, scale, and medical-grade technology | Patients, patient representatives, and law firms using professional accounts |
| HIPAA / security | HIPAA-compliant under BAA, SOC 2 Type 2, bank-level encryption | HIPAA compliant (per ChartSquad) |
Competitor details come from public company materials (see sources). Figures a vendor does not publish are marked "not publicly disclosed."
Where ChartSquad stands out
Patient right-of-access pricing
ChartSquad requests records as a Personal Health Record so patients pay the lowest cost permitted by law, and it flags fees that look non-compliant (per ChartSquad).
Published 15-day average
Its about page cites a nationwide average response of 15 days, a public benchmark most retrieval vendors do not post.
Shareable patient PHR
Records land in the patient's ChartSquad account. The patient can share them with a firm, set time limits, and revoke access.
Clio-embedded workflow
ChartSquad is a fully embedded Clio app, so Clio-based firms can launch and track requests from the matter.
Firms evaluating ChartSquad often accept the 15-day average as the tradeoff for patient-access pricing, which is slower than a 4-day retrieval standard.
Where LlamaLab stands out
4-day average retrieval
Records come back in 4 days on average, and 30 to 40% arrive the same day. On Camp Lejeune, the same system cut VA record retrieval from 90 days to 4.
Direct facility relationships
LlamaLab submits requests as a healthcare organization, and direct hospital and facility partnerships move those requests past standard vendor queues. That access is why records can come back the same day.
Reverse provider discovery
Reverse search runs insurance claims data against a proprietary network of 4M+ facilities and finds the specialists, urgent-care visits, and prior treatment clients forget, so requests stop depending on client memory alone.
Clinical case qualification
A licensed clinical team confirms proof of injury, not just page counts, backed by clinical AI that scored 98% on physician board exams. On a PFAS portfolio, LlamaLab qualified 10,000 cases in three weeks at an 84% qualification rate.
Mass tort portfolio intelligence
Query thousands of cases in plain English to qualify and re-qualify claimants. On the last large engagement, docket queries surfaced 5 to 10 percent more clients eligible for other litigations.
Recoverable, retrieval-only pricing
Pricing is public: $50 per facility request, with no platform, license, or technology fees, so every dollar stays a recoverable case expense instead of firm overhead. Optional models let firms pay only for the cases that qualify.
Case management integrations
LlamaLab integrates with Litify, SmartAdvocate, Needles, and Clio, and any other case management system can connect through our API, so retrieval starts from the matter.
Feature by feature
Retrieval speed
ChartSquad publishes a 15-day nationwide average. LlamaLab gets records back in 4 days on average, and 30 to 40% come back same day. Both numbers come from each company's own materials. The gap is the request channel: LlamaLab submits as a healthcare organization, and direct facility partnerships move its requests past the vendor queues other services wait in.
Who sits at the center of the request
ChartSquad is built around the patient's federal right of access. The firm refers the client, records land in the patient PHR, and the client shares them. LlamaLab runs retrieval for the firm: reverse search finds providers the client never listed, then a licensed clinician confirms proof of injury.
After the records arrive
ChartSquad stores and shares records in the PHR. It does not publish a clinical qualification step. LlamaLab's licensed clinical team signs off on proof of injury in under 7 days, which is what mass tort funders and co-counsel ask to see.
Pricing and recoverability
ChartSquad markets free requests with provider fees passed through at the lowest legally permitted cost. LlamaLab publishes $50 per facility request and bills retrieval only, so the invoice stays a recoverable case expense. Compare total case cost, not just the headline fee.
Pricing comparison
ChartSquad markets free requests and passes provider fees through at the lowest legally permitted cost. LlamaLab publishes $50 per facility request with retrieval-only billing, so the full invoice stays recoverable from settlement.
LlamaLab
- $50 per facility request for medical and billing records, published publicly
- Case setup fee of $150 on Basic, waived on Unlimited
- Retrieval-only billing stays a recoverable case expense, not firm overhead
- Optional models let firms pay only for cases that qualify
ChartSquad
Request is free; provider fees passed through at the lowest legally permitted cost (per ChartSquad)
Per public materials at the time of writing (see sources).
Which one fits your firm?
When to choose ChartSquad
- You want patient-directed right-of-access retrieval at the lowest legally permitted cost, and a 15-day average fits your timelines.
- A shareable patient PHR is how you want records stored and permissioned.
- Your firm runs on Clio and wants requests launched from the matter.
When to choose LlamaLab
- A 15-day average is too slow for your demands and filings.
- Clients don't remember every provider and you need discovery from insurance data.
- You want a clinician's proof-of-injury decision, not just a shared PHR.
- You want published retrieval-only pricing you can recover at settlement.
Real impact across major mass torts
How firms use LlamaLab to process thousands of cases faster.
- VA records delivered in 4 days on average vs. 90+ day industry standard
- Cut one firm's budgeted processing time from 2 years to 6 months
- Processed 10,000 cases from no records to evidence packages in 3 weeks with an 84% qualification rate
- Discovered exposure records linking clients to contaminated water sources
- Raised proof-of-injury rate 20% by correcting teams' misinterpretation of records
- Retrieved medical records going back 25+ years
LlamaLab vs ChartSquad, answered
For plaintiff medical record retrieval, yes. ChartSquad is the superior choice for patient-directed right-of-access retrieval at the lowest legally permitted cost. LlamaLab is the default when a 15-day average is too slow and you need provider discovery plus clinical qualification.
ChartSquad is a Personal Health Record that retrieves under the patient's right of access. LlamaLab is a plaintiff-side medical evidence platform: retrieval in 4 days on average, reverse provider discovery from insurance data, and a licensed clinician's proof-of-injury decision.
ChartSquad passes provider fees through at the lowest legally permitted cost and does not publish a firm-side rate card. LlamaLab publishes $50 per facility request, retrieval-only, recoverable from settlement. Compare total case cost, not just the headline fee.
For retrieval, discovery, and qualification, yes. Firms that specifically want a patient PHR, OCR fee-complaint workflow, or Clio-embedded patient-access requests should weigh those features.
Firms that want patient-directed right-of-access retrieval at the lowest cost permitted by law, with records stored in a shareable PHR, and that can work with a 15-day average.
Keep comparing
See the difference on your own cases
Submit your first case free and compare LlamaLab's speed, provider discovery, and clinical qualification against what you use today.