LlamaLab vs Lexitas

Evidence in days, not a managed-service wait. The AI-native alternative to managed retrieval.

What is record retrieval?
Same-day retrieval
AI provider discovery
Clinical qualification

Purpose-built for speed, not just scale

LlamaLab excels as a purpose-built medical-evidence platform best suited for plaintiff firms where records decide the case, particularly same-day retrieval with provider discovery, a licensed clinical team that qualifies proof of injury, and mass tort portfolio qualification at scale. Lexitas is the better fit if you want one vendor across all litigation support, not just medical records.

Capability
LlamaLab
Lexitas
Category focus
AI-native medical evidence for plaintiff firms
Full-suite litigation support (records is one service)
Track record
Trusted by 250+ law firms; AI-native since 2024
Litigation support since 1987
Retrieval turnaround
Same-day to 48 hours
30-45 day average turnaround (per Lexitas)
Provider discovery
Proprietary 4M+ facility network; reverse search finds ~3x more providers than client memory
4M+ provider/custodian relationships; retrieves named providers
Case qualification
Licensed clinical team qualifies proof of injury in under 7 days
Record Insights AI medical chronology / summaries
Portfolio / AI queries
Plain-English queries for complex medical records across the entire portfolio
Per-matter chronologies and summaries
Pricing & recoverability
Retrieval-only billing, no platform fees, fully recoverable — optional pay-only-for-qualified-cases model
Custom; bundled across litigation-support services
Primary audience
Personal injury & mass tort plaintiff firms wanting speed, scale, and medical-grade technology
Law firms, insurance, and corporate legal
HIPAA / security
HIPAA-compliant under BAA, SOC 2 Type 2, bank-level encryption
SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, 256-bit encryption

Competitor details sourced from public company materials (see sources). Figures a vendor does not publish are marked “not publicly disclosed.”

Proven Results

Real impact across major mass torts

How leading firms use LlamaLab to process thousands of cases faster.

Camp Lejeune
4 days
avg VA record retrieval
  • VA records delivered in 4 days on average vs. 90+ day industry standard
  • Cut one firm's budgeted processing time from 3 years to 6 months
View Interactive Story
PFAS Litigation
30,000+
cases processed
  • Processed 10,000 cases from no records to evidence packages in 3 weeks with an 87% qualification rate
  • Discovered exposure records linking clients to contaminated water sources
Depo-Provera
+20%
qualification rate increase
  • Raised proof-of-injury rate 20% by correcting teams' misinterpretation of records
  • Retrieved medical records going back 25+ years

LlamaLab vs Lexitas, answered

For medical evidence specifically, LlamaLab goes deeper — same-day retrieval, provider discovery, and clinical qualification. Lexitas is better if you want one vendor across all litigation support, not just records.

Lexitas is a broad litigation-support company where records are one of many services. LlamaLab is purpose-built for medical evidence: retrieval, provider discovery, and clinical case qualification for plaintiff and mass tort firms.

Lexitas prices custom and bundled. LlamaLab is retrieval-only with no platform fee, which keeps the cost transparent and fully recoverable from settlement rather than absorbed as overhead.

For the medical-records portion of a case, yes. LlamaLab does not provide court reporting, depositions, or process serving, so firms relying on Lexitas for those would keep a separate vendor for them.

Firms that want a single national vendor across court reporting, depositions, process service, staffing, and records — and whose record-review needs are met by AI chronologies rather than clinical qualification.

See the difference on your own cases

Submit your first case free and compare LlamaLab's speed, provider discovery, and clinical qualification against what you use today.