LlamaLab vs Codes Health
Codes Health is the superior choice for medical malpractice firms that want human-verified breach-of-care flagging bundled with retrieval, especially Filevine-based firms after the July 2026 partnership. LlamaLab excels as the faster, more complete medical evidence platform for PI and mass tort plaintiff firms, particularly records back in 4 days on average versus their published 1 to 2 week turnaround, reverse provider discovery that finds providers clients never listed and public recoverable pricing with documented mass tort scale.
Speed and completeness, not speed or completeness
Codes Health is a Brooklyn-based, Y Combinator-backed medical record retrieval company (founded 2024) that pairs agentic AI retrieval with human-verified record review for plaintiff firms.
| Capability | LlamaLab | Codes Health |
|---|---|---|
| Category focus | AI-native medical evidence for plaintiff firms | AI retrieval + human-verified record review for plaintiff firms |
| Track record | Trusted by 250+ law firms; AI-native since 2024 | Founded 2024 (Y Combinator S24), Brooklyn |
| Retrieval turnaround | 4 days on average; 30 to 40% of records back same day | 1 to 2 weeks average (per its site); no same-day retrieval per its own comparisons |
| Facility relationships | Healthcare-to-healthcare entity; direct facility partnerships move requests past standard vendor queues | Does not publicly document healthcare-entity status or facility partnerships |
| Provider discovery | Reverse search runs insurance claims data to find providers clients never listed; 4M+ facility network | Claims-network connections; missing-record checks run against known treatment sites and the providers on your request |
| Case qualification | Licensed clinical team qualifies proof of injury in under 7 days | AI insights verified by humans (breach-of-care flags, chronologies); no licensed-clinician qualification decision publicly documented |
| Portfolio / AI queries | Plain-English queries for complex medical records across the entire portfolio | Per-case summaries and chronologies |
| Pricing & recoverability | Public pricing: $50 per facility request, retrieval-only billing, fully recoverable, optional pay-only-for-qualified-cases model | No public rate card; demo-based |
| Primary audience | Personal injury & mass tort plaintiff firms wanting speed, scale, and medical-grade technology | Plaintiff firms: PI, mass torts, med-mal |
| HIPAA / security | HIPAA-compliant under BAA, SOC 2 Type 2, bank-level encryption | HIPAA, AES-256, BAAs, penetration testing (per its site) |
Competitor details come from public company materials (see sources). Figures a vendor does not publish are marked "not publicly disclosed."
Where Codes Health stands out
Human-verified AI review
Its AI extracts case insights such as breach-of-care flags, diagnoses, and future expenses, with human verification before results reach your team (per its site).
Breach-of-care flagging for med-mal
Standard-of-care insights are rare among retrieval vendors and matter most in medical malpractice screening.
Embedded in Filevine
A partnership announced July 13, 2026 embeds requests, status tracking, and record delivery inside Filevine case files.
Pre-submission error checking
Its AI checks authorizations, date ranges, and provider-specific requirements before submission to reduce preventable rejections (per its site).
Firms evaluating Codes Health often mention multi-week waits and hard-to-reach support for a young retrieval vendor.
Where LlamaLab stands out
4-day average retrieval
Records come back in 4 days on average, and 30 to 40% arrive the same day. On Camp Lejeune, the same system cut VA record retrieval from 90 days to 4.
Direct facility relationships
LlamaLab submits requests as a healthcare organization, and direct hospital and facility partnerships move those requests past standard vendor queues. That access is why records can come back the same day.
Reverse provider discovery
Reverse search runs insurance claims data against a proprietary network of 4M+ facilities and finds the specialists, urgent-care visits, and prior treatment clients forget, so requests stop depending on client memory alone.
Clinical case qualification
A licensed clinical team confirms proof of injury, not just page counts, backed by clinical AI that scored 98% on physician board exams. On a PFAS portfolio, LlamaLab qualified 10,000 cases in three weeks at an 84% qualification rate.
Mass tort portfolio intelligence
Query thousands of cases in plain English to qualify and re-qualify claimants. On the last large engagement, docket queries surfaced 5 to 10 percent more clients eligible for other litigations.
Recoverable, retrieval-only pricing
Pricing is public: $50 per facility request, with no platform, license, or technology fees, so every dollar stays a recoverable case expense instead of firm overhead. Optional models let firms pay only for the cases that qualify.
Case management integrations
LlamaLab integrates with Litify, SmartAdvocate, Needles, and Clio, and any other case management system can connect through the public Integration Guide at docs.llamalab.ai, so retrieval starts from the matter.
Feature by feature
Retrieval speed: 4 days on average vs 1 to 2 weeks
Codes Health's homepage lists a 1 to 2 week average turnaround, and its own comparison posts state it does not offer same-day retrieval and delivers "in a couple of weeks." LlamaLab gets records back in 4 days on average, and 30 to 40% come back same day. Both numbers come straight from each company's own materials. The gap is the request channel: LlamaLab submits as a healthcare organization, and direct facility partnerships move its requests past the vendor queues other services wait in.
Completeness comes from discovery, not from waiting longer
Codes Health argues that speed-first retrieval risks incomplete records. That argument skips a step: completeness depends on knowing every provider, and its own materials describe checking completeness against known treatment sites and the provider list on your request. LlamaLab runs the client's insurance claims data to find the providers nobody wrote down at intake, then a licensed clinician confirms proof of injury. A two-week wait doesn't find a provider nobody asked for. When a national mass tort firm sent LlamaLab 100 cases it couldn't qualify because the records were unreachable (closed facilities, clients who couldn't remember where they treated), that discovery-first approach qualified about 40 of them.
Analysis: verified insights vs clinical qualification
Codes Health's human-verified breach-of-care and future-expense flags are real and useful, especially for med-mal screening. LlamaLab's analysis ends in a decision: a licensed clinical team signs off on proof of injury in under 7 days, which is what mass tort funders and co-counsel ask to see. When one firm paired that review with its internal team, its qualification rate went from 65% to 84%.
Pricing transparency
Codes Health doesn't publish a rate card; pricing runs through a demo. LlamaLab publishes pricing: $50 per facility request, retrieval-only billing, and your firm passes the invoice through at settlement as a recoverable case expense.
Case management integrations
Codes Health publicly documents a Filevine partnership and describes custom CRM integrations for high-volume customers. We are not aware of a Litify integration for Codes Health. LlamaLab integrates with Litify, SmartAdvocate, Needles, and Clio, and any other case management system can integrate through the public Integration Guide at docs.llamalab.ai, so retrieval starts from the matter.
Pricing comparison
Codes Health doesn't publish a rate card; pricing runs through a demo call. LlamaLab publishes pricing at $50 per facility request with retrieval-only billing, and the whole invoice stays recoverable.
LlamaLab
- $50 per facility request for medical and billing records, published publicly
- Case setup fee of $150 on Basic, waived on Unlimited
- Retrieval-only billing stays a recoverable case expense, not firm overhead
- Optional models let firms pay only for cases that qualify
Codes Health
No public rate card; demo-based
Per public materials at the time of writing (see sources).
Which one fits your firm?
When to choose Codes Health
- Human-verified breach-of-care flagging is the feature your med-mal screening needs.
- Your firm runs on Filevine and wants requests and delivery embedded in the case file.
- A 1 to 2 week average turnaround fits your case timelines.
When to choose LlamaLab
- Records gate your demands and filings and you need them in days, not weeks.
- Clients don't remember every provider, so you need discovery from insurance data rather than checks against the request list.
- You want a licensed clinician's proof-of-injury decision at PI and mass tort scale.
- You want published pricing that stays a recoverable case expense.
- You're qualifying a mass tort docket and need thousands of decisions in weeks.
- You run Litify, SmartAdvocate, Needles, or Clio and want retrieval wired into that stack.
Real impact across major mass torts
How firms use LlamaLab to process thousands of cases faster.
- VA records delivered in 4 days on average vs. 90+ day industry standard
- Cut one firm's budgeted processing time from 2 years to 6 months
- Processed 10,000 cases from no records to evidence packages in 3 weeks with an 84% qualification rate
- Discovered exposure records linking clients to contaminated water sources
- Raised proof-of-injury rate 20% by correcting teams' misinterpretation of records
- Retrieved medical records going back 25+ years
LlamaLab vs Codes Health, answered
For speed and completeness together, yes: LlamaLab returns records in 4 days on average versus Codes Health's published 1 to 2 weeks, and adds reverse provider discovery plus clinical qualification. Codes Health is a strong pick for med-mal firms that want its human-verified breach-of-care flags.
Both retrieve and analyze records for plaintiff firms. Codes Health pairs retrieval with human-verified insights on a 1 to 2 week average turnaround. LlamaLab retrieves in 4 days on average, discovers providers clients never listed via insurance data, and has a licensed clinical team qualify proof of injury.
Codes Health doesn't publish pricing, so a direct comparison isn't possible. LlamaLab publishes its rates: $50 per facility request, retrieval-only billing, fully recoverable from settlement. You can price a case before you commit.
For retrieval, analysis, and qualification, yes, and LlamaLab adds reverse provider discovery Codes Health doesn't document. Med-mal firms that specifically want Codes Health's breach-of-care flagging, or Filevine-embedded delivery, should weigh those features.
Medical malpractice firms that want human-verified breach-of-care insights bundled with retrieval, and Filevine-based firms that want records requested and delivered inside their case files, provided a 1 to 2 week average turnaround fits their timelines.
Codes Health's site lists a 1 to 2 week average turnaround, with its process page describing days 1 to 14 for retrieval. Its own comparison posts state it does not offer same-day retrieval. LlamaLab averages 4 days, with 30 to 40% of records back same day.
No. Completeness depends on knowing every provider, not on how long retrieval takes. LlamaLab runs the client's insurance claims data to find providers that were never on the request list, then a licensed clinician confirms proof of injury. A longer wait doesn't add providers no one requested.
No public rate card appears on its website; pricing runs through a demo call. LlamaLab publishes pricing at $50 per facility request on its pricing page, and retrieval-only billing keeps the cost recoverable from settlement.
We are not aware of a Litify integration for Codes Health. Its publicly documented case-management partnership is Filevine, with custom CRM work described for high-volume customers. LlamaLab integrates with Litify, SmartAdvocate, Needles, and Clio, and can add other systems your firm already runs.
Sources
- Codes Health: Home (turnaround, review, security)
- Y Combinator: Codes Health (founded 2024, S24)
- PRNewswire: Filevine partners with Codes Health (July 13, 2026)
- Filevine: partnership announcement
- Codes Health blog: "does not offer same-day retrieval... a couple of weeks"
- Codes Health blog: completeness checked against provider lists; custom CRM for high-volume
- LlamaLab: public pricing
- LlamaLab: Litify integration
- LlamaLab: Integration Guide
See the difference on your own cases
Submit your first case free and compare LlamaLab's speed, provider discovery, and clinical qualification against what you use today.